Working on and
with a project description was the topic of today. First, some input about the
structure of a project proposal was discussed. For me it was interesting, that the
summery is the most important part. This is mostly read first by the penal. I
also recognize that there was a misunderstanding in the course preparation. The
main goal of this course is writing a project description, which should be
founded afterwards.
In the
afternoon the individual project descriptions were investigated – each by three
people. The outcome was a anonymous feedback to each author considering
following questions:
- Originality in the form of scientific innovation and/or the development of new knowledge.
- Whether the research question, hypotheses and objectives have been clearly and adequately specified.
- The strength of the theoretical approach, operationalization and use of scientific methods.
- Documented knowledge about the research front.
- The degree to which the scientific basis of the project is realistic.
- The scientific scope in terms of a multi- and interdisciplinary approach, when relevant.
Based on
this feedback, improvements on the own project description will follow.
No comments:
Post a Comment